tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-218353015398884058.post6265375780645398720..comments2009-02-05T10:56:14.978-06:00Anne Adrianhttps://profiles.google.com/117576504552045485952noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-218353015398884058.post-56992632366560358342009-02-05T10:56:00.000-06:002009-02-05T10:56:00.000-06:00Thanks @(76) to answering the question yesterday. I find explaining Twitter is difficult sometimes. Truth be known, I was taken a back a little with the Twitter vs Email question. <BR/><BR/>1) The question indicated he had at least heard of Twitter.<BR/><BR/>2) He wanted an answer to convince one to stop using one for another. <BR/><BR/>These new tools seldom take the old tools away. Rather I think the new tools give us better fitting tools for particular tasks. For instance, wikis are much better for collaboration than sending email attachments. <BR/><BR/>Email is still needed and useful. Twitter will not replace it. Though Twitter is better for establishing authenticity and conncetions, as well as all the things everyone mentioned.Anne Adrianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10353479928793096415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-218353015398884058.post-33965074854252320972009-02-05T09:48:00.000-06:002009-02-05T09:48:00.000-06:00@(76) thinks that it was a great post. Should help me explain what until now has been the unexplainable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com